Opening/closing pattern of Trifecta and Freestyle valves versus native aortic valve: Are stentless valves more physiologic than a stented valve?

Background: Stentless valves have long been considered the ideal valves in terms of hemodynamics. Recently, the Trifecta valve, a stented bioprosthesis with excellent fluid dynamic characteristics, has become available. The aim of the study was to compare the opening/closing pattern of the Freestyle stentless valve and the Trifecta valve with that of the native aortic valve.

Methods: A total of 12 patients with a Freestyle and 10 with a Trifecta valve were compared to normal native aortic valves in 12 control patients. Leaflet kinematics and hemodynamic parameters were obtained by echocardiographic M-mode and Doppler measurements.

Results: The control group displayed significantly longer Rapid Valve Opening Time (45 ± 7 ms) and Rapid Valve Closing Time (42 ± 9 ms) than Freestyle patients (Rapid Valve Opening Time: 32 ± 7 ms; Rapid Valve Closing Time: 31 ± 8 ms) and Trifecta patients (Rapid Valve Opening Time: 31 ± 7 ms; Rapid Valve Closing Time: 30 ± 8 ms) (P < 0.0001). The maximal leaflet displacement reached at the end of rapid valve opening was 16.7 ± 3.2 mm, 17.7 ± 2.3 mm, and 17.7 ± 5.3 mm (P = 0.42) in the Freestyle, Trifecta, and control groups, respectively. The total opening time was shorter in the control group (223 ± 25 ms) than in Freestyle (319 ± 61 ms) and Trifecta (324 ± 46 ms) patients (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The Freestyle stentless valve was not superior to the Trifecta valve in terms of kinematics and functions more like a stented bioprosthesis.