Epidemiology of malpractice claims in the orthopedic and trauma surgery department of a French teaching hospital: A 10-year retrospective study

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Feb;104(1):11-15. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopedic and trauma surgery is the specialty for which claims for compensation are most often filed. Little data exists on the subject in France, especially in a teaching hospital. We conducted a retrospective study aimed at (1) identifying the epidemiological characteristics of patients filing claims against the orthopedic surgery and traumatology department of a teaching hospital in France, (2) analyzing the surgical procedures involved, the type of legal proceedings, and the financial consequences.

Hypothesis: The epidemiological profile of proceedings seeking damages in France is consistent with the data from European and American studies.

Materials and methods: An observational, retrospective, single-center study of all claims for damages between 2007 and 2016 involving the orthopedic and trauma surgery department of a teaching hospital was carried out. Patients' epidemiological data, the surgical procedure, type of legal proceeding, and financial consequences were analyzed.

Results: Of the 51,582 surgical procedures performed, 71 claims (0.0014%) were analyzed (i.e., 1/726 procedures). A significant increase in the number of cases (p=0.040) was found over a 10-year period. Of these, 36/71 (53.7%) were submitted to the French regional conciliation and compensation commission (CRCI), 23/71 (32.8%) were filed with the administrative court, and 12/71 (13.4%) were submitted for an amicable settlement. The most common reason for which patients filed claims was hospital-acquired infections, with 36/71 (50.7%) cases. Twenty-nine complaints (40.8%) resulted in monetary damages being awarded to the patient, with an average award of € 28,301 (€ 2,400-299,508). Damage awards were significantly higher (p<0.05) for cases involving surgery on a lower limb than those involving an upper limb.

Conclusion: Claims against orthopedic surgeons have been increasing significantly over the last 10 years. Although rare, they represent a significant cost to society. Hospital-acquired infections are the main reason for disputes in our specialization.

Level of evidence: IV, retrospective study.

Keywords: Compensation; Litigation; Personal injury claims.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Compensation and Redress / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Cross Infection / economics
  • Cross Infection / epidemiology
  • Female
  • France / epidemiology
  • Hospitals, Teaching / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Hospitals, Teaching / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Malpractice / economics*
  • Malpractice / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Malpractice / statistics & numerical data
  • Middle Aged
  • Orthopedic Procedures / adverse effects*
  • Orthopedic Procedures / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Orthopedic Procedures / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Traumatology / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Traumatology / statistics & numerical data
  • Young Adult