Comparative study of ipsilesional and contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations for acute infarction

J Neurol Sci. 2018 Jan 15:384:10-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is reported to improve chronic post-stoke hemiparesis. However, application of rTMS during the acute phase of post-stroke has not fully been investigated. We investigated the safety and the efficacy of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) of the affected motor cortex and 1-Hz stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere during the acute phase in patients with hemiparesis due to capsular infarction.

Methods: Twenty one patients who met the study criteria were randomly assigned to receive, starting within 7days after stroke onset and for a period of 10days, iTBS of the affected motor cortex hand area (n=8), 1-Hz stimulation of the unaffected motor cortex hand area (n=7), or sham stimulation (n=6). Upper limb motor function was evaluated before rTMS and 12weeks after onset of the stroke. Evaluation was based on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), grip strength, and motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle.

Results: Both iTBS applied to the affected motor cortex hand area and 1-Hz stimulation applied to the unaffected motor cortex hand area enhanced motor recovery. In comparison to sham stimulation, iTBS increased the SIAS finger-function test score, and 1-Hz stimulation decreased the MAS wrist and finger score.

Conclusions: Ipsilesional iTBS and contralesional 1-Hz stimulation applied during the acute phase of stroke have different effects: ipsilesional iTBS improves movement of the affected limb, whereas contralesional 1-Hz stimulation reduces spasticity of the affected limb.

Keywords: Acute capsular infarction; Intermittent theta-burst stimulation; Low-frequency stimulation; Motor cortex; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Aged
  • Brain Infarction / complications
  • Brain Infarction / physiopathology
  • Brain Infarction / rehabilitation*
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Evoked Potentials, Motor
  • Female
  • Functional Laterality* / physiology
  • Hand Strength
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motor Activity
  • Motor Cortex* / physiopathology
  • Muscle, Skeletal / physiopathology
  • Paresis / etiology
  • Paresis / physiopathology
  • Paresis / rehabilitation*
  • Stroke Rehabilitation / methods
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Upper Extremity / physiopathology