Involving citizens in disinvestment decisions: what do health professionals think? Findings from a multi-method study in the English NHS

Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Apr;13(2):162-188. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000330. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

Abstract

Public involvement in disinvestment decision making in health care is widely advocated, and in some cases legally mandated. However, attempts to involve the public in other areas of health policy have been accused of tokenism and manipulation. This paper presents research into the views of local health care leaders in the English National Health Service (NHS) with regards to the involvement of citizens and local communities in disinvestment decision making. The research includes a Q study and follow-up interviews with a sample of health care clinicians and managers in senior roles in the English NHS. It finds that whilst initial responses suggest high levels of support for public involvement, further probing of attitudes and experiences shows higher levels of ambivalence and risk aversion and a far more cautious overall stance. This study has implications for the future of disinvestment activities and public involvement in health care systems faced with increased resource constraint. Recommendations are made for future research and practice.

MeSH terms

  • Decision Making*
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • England
  • Health Personnel / psychology*
  • Health Services Research*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Q-Sort
  • Resource Allocation*
  • State Medicine / economics