[Outcome of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention]

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 24;45(12):1058-1066. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.12.010.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) . Methods: From January to December 2013, 10 445 consecutive patients who underwent PCI in Fuwai Hospital and the LVEF value was available were prospectively included. The patients were divided into LVEF≥50% group (9 896 cases) and LVEF<50% group (549 cases) . The in-hospital and 2-year clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. The association between LVEF<50% and clinical outcomes was assessed using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: (1) Compared with LVEF ≥50% group, LVEF< 50% group had higher rates of in-hospital all-cause death (1.1% (6/549) vs. 0.2% (17/9 896) , P<0.01) , cardiac death (1.1% (6/549) vs. 0.1% (12/9 896) , P<0.01) , in-stent thrombosis (0.7% (4/549) vs. 0.2% (18/9 896) , P<0.01) , myocardial infarction (2.4% (13/549) vs. 1.2% (121/9 896) , P<0.05) ,and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) which including death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, in-stent thrombosis, and stroke (3.6% (20/549) vs. 1.4% (137/9 896) , P<0.01) . (2) A total of 10 388 (99.5%) patients completed 2-year follow-up. Compared with LVEF ≥50% group, LVEF<50% group had higher rates of 2-year all-cause death (4.7% (26/549) vs. 1.0% (101/9 896) , P<0.01) , cardiac death (4.0% (22/549) vs. 0.5% (50/9 896) , P<0.01) , in-stent thrombosis (3.1% (17/549) vs. 0.7% (71/9 896) , P<0.001) , myocardial infarction (4.2% (23/549) vs. 1.9% (186/9 896) , P<0.01) ,and MACCE (17.9% (98/549) vs. 11.8% (1 172/9 896) , P<0.01) . There were no significant differences on the rates of 2-year target-vessel revascularization, bleeding and stroke between the two groups. (3) The multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that LVEF< 50% was the independent risk factor of 2-year all-cause death (HR=2.47, 95%CI 1.49-4.08, P<0.01) , cardiac death (HR=3.25, 95%CI 1.79-5.90, P<0.01) , in-stent thrombosis (HR=4.19, 95%CI 2.39-7.34, P<0.01) , myocardial infarction (HR=2.00, 95%CI 1.26-3.16, P<0.01) , and MACCE (HR=1.40, 95%CI 1.13-1.74, P<0.01) . (4) After propensity score matching, all in-hospital outcomes were similar between the two groups, including all-cause death, cardiac death, in-stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, revascularization, bleeding, stroke, and MACCE (all P>0.05) . After propensity score matching,the multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that LVEF<50% was still an independent risk factor of 2-year all-cause death (HR=3.08, 95%CI 1.37-6.89, P<0.01) , cardiac death (HR= 4.12, 95%CI 1.53-11.07, P<0.01) ,and in-stent thrombosis (HR=3.82, 95%CI 1.27-11.5, P<0.05) . Conclusion: LVEF< 50% is an independent risk factor of 2-year all-cause death, cardiac death, and in-stent thrombosis in patients undergoing PCI, but it does not increase the risk of target-vessel revascularization, bleeding or stroke.

目的: 探讨左心室射血分数(LVEF)<50%的冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后的院内及远期预后。 方法: 采用前瞻性研究方法,连续入选2013年1至12月在阜外医院行PCI且有超声心动图LVEF资料的冠心病患者10 445例。按照LVEF值,将入选患者分为LVEF≥50%组(9 896例)和LVEF<50%组(549例)。比较2组患者PCI术后院内及2年临床预后,并采用多因素Cox回归分析LVEF<50%与PCI术后不良事件的相关性。 结果: (1)LVEF<50%组术后院内全因死亡[1.1%(6/549)比0.2%(17/9 896),P<0.01]、心原性死亡[1.1%(6/549)比0.1%(12/9 896),P<0.01]、支架内血栓形成[0.7%(4/549)比0.2%(18/9 896), P<0.01]、心肌梗死[2.4%(13/549)比1.2%(121/9 896), P<0.05]和主要不良心脑血管事件[包括死亡、心肌梗死、血运重建、支架内血栓形成和卒中,3.6%(20/549)比1.4%(137/9 896), P<0.01]发生率均高于LVEF≥50%组。(2)10 388例(99.5%)患者完成PCI术后2年随访。LVEF<50%组术后2年全因死亡[4.7%(26/549)比1.0%(101/9 896), P<0.01]、心原性死亡[4.0%(22/549)比0.5%(50/9 896), P<0.01]、支架内血栓形成[3.1%(17/549)比0.7%(71/9 896), P<0.01]、心肌梗死[4.2%(23/549)比1.9%(186/9 896), P<0.01]和主要不良心脑血管事件[17.9%(98/549)比11.8%(1172/9 896), P<0.01]发生率均高于LVEF≥50%组,而两组之间的靶血管重建、出血和卒中发生率差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。(3)多因素Cox回归分析显示,LVEF<50%是PCI术后2年全因死亡(HR=2.47,95%CI 1.49~4.08,P<0.01)、心原性死亡(HR=3.25,95%CI 1.79~5.90,P<0.01)、支架内血栓形成(HR=4.19,95%CI 2.39~7.34,P<0.01)、心肌梗死(HR=2.00,95%CI 1.26~3.16,P<0.01)和主要不良心脑血管事件(HR=1.40,95%CI 1.13~1.74,P<0.01)的独立危险因素。(4)倾向性评分匹配后,两组之间的术后院内全因死亡、心原性死亡、支架内血栓形成、心肌梗死、再次血运重建、出血、卒中和主要不良心脑血管事件发生率差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,倾向性评分匹配后,LVEF<50%是PCI术后2年全因死亡(HR=3.08,95%CI 1.37~6.89,P<0.01)、心原性死亡(HR= 4.12, 95%CI 1.53~11.07, P<0.01)和支架内血栓形成(HR=3.82,95%CI 1.27~11.5,P<0.05)的独立危险因素。 结论: LVEF<50%是冠心病患者PCI术后2年全因死亡、心原性死亡及支架内血栓形成的独立危险因素,但不增加靶血管重建、出血及卒中的风险。.

Keywords: Angioplasty; Coronary artery disease; Prognosis.

MeSH terms

  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention*
  • Propensity Score
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke
  • Stroke Volume
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Function, Left*