Editorial Evaluation, Peer Review, and Publication of Research Reports With and Without Supplementary Online Content

Annette Flanagin; Stacy L Christiansen; Chris Borden; Demetrios N Kyriacou; Caroline Sietmann; Elaine Williams; Larry Bryant

doi:10.1001/jama.2017.20650

Editorial Evaluation, Peer Review, and Publication of Research Reports With and Without Supplementary Online Content

JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):410. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20650.

Authors

Annette Flanagin¹, Stacy L Christiansen¹, Chris Borden¹, Demetrios N Kyriacou¹, Caroline Sietmann¹, Elaine Williams¹, Larry Bryant¹

Affiliation

¹ The JAMA Network, Chicago, Illinois.

Abstract

This study assesses whether research manuscripts with supplemental material submitted in 2016 to JAMA, JAMA Internal Medicine, and JAMA Pediatrics were more likely than those without supplements to undergo peer review, be accepted, and have more online views and downloads.

MeSH terms

Biomedical Research
Editorial Policies
Internet
Peer Review, Research*
Periodicals as Topic
Publishing*
Research Report