[Selective preimplantation pathological evaluation in renal transplantation: a single center's experience]

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 16;98(3):186-190. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.03.006.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the clinical data of pre-implantation biopsy donors in our hospital and explore the clinical characteristics of those donors in pathological high-risk, and to provide references for the selective histological evaluation of extended criteria donor kidneys. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data and pre-implantation renal pathologic score of donors from January 1, 2015 to May 1, 2017.During this period, 247 cases of donation after citizen's death (DCD) occurred.After clinical evaluation and selective machine perfusion( Lifeport) evaluation, 30 cases of pre-implantation pathological evaluation were performed.According to Remuzzi scores, donors were divided into low-risk and high-risk group.Nine cases of low-risk group (bilateral kidney's Remuzzi score ≤3) and 16 cases of high-risk group (bilateral or unilateral kidney's Remuzzi score ≥4, severe glomerular micro-thrombi or severe tubular necrosis) were included.Five cases of donors were excluded due to only unilateral renal pathological result available.Both high-risk and low-risk groups' clinical data, including sex, age, height, body weight, body mass index, proteinuria, hematuria, urinary glucose, baseline or admission serum creatinine, serum creatinine before procurement, history of hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus, cardiopulmonary resuscitation or not, with or without the history of shock, urine output prior to acquisition, macroscopical manifestations of donor kidney, cause of death were statistically analyzed. Results: The donors' baseline serum creatinine/upper limit of normal serum creatinine range in high-risk group were significantly higher than that in low-risk group [(129.8±42.2)% vs(92.4±30.5)%, P=0.029]. The poor macroscopical manifestations of donor kidneys were significantly more frequent in high-risk group than that in low-risk group (12/16 vs 0/9, P= 0). No significant differences between two groups were found regarding their age, height, weight, BMI, proteinuria, hematuria, urine glucose, pre-procure creatinine level, history of hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus, cause of death and so on (P>0.05). Conclusions: After clinical evaluation and selective Lifeport evaluation, donor grafts of whose baseline serum creatinine levels increased beyond normal range and of whose grafts' macroscopical manifestations were poor, should undergo pre-implantation pathological evaluation further.Also, it is reasonable to perform pre-implantation biopsy in cases of equivocal results after Lifeport evaluation.This will be beneficial to identify histological high-risk donors and also be predictive to allocate the grafts.

目的: 总结分析中南大学湘雅二医院开展的移植前供肾病理检查的供者临床资料,摸索高危病理评分供者的临床特点,为扩大标准供肾供者行选择性病理评估提供临床依据。 方法: 回顾性分析了2015年1月1日至2017年5月1日,中南大学湘雅二医院行移植前病理检查的供者临床数据和病理评分。共获取公民逝世后器官捐献(DCD)供者247例,依次经过临床评估、选择性机械灌注评估(Lifeport评估)后,选择性开展了30例供体的移植前供肾病理评估。按照Remuzzi评分将供者分为病理低危组(双肾Remuzzi评分均≤ 3分)9例,病理高危组(双肾或单肾Remuzzi评分≥4分或肾小球广泛微血栓形成或严重肾小管坏死)16例。另有5例供者仅行单肾病理检查,没有纳入研究。对两组供者临床资料进行统计学比较,包括性别、年龄、身高、体质量、体质指数、尿蛋白、血尿、尿糖、基础血清肌酐、获取前血清肌酐、高血压糖尿病史、是否心肺复苏、是否休克病史、获取前尿量、供肾大体观、死亡原因等。 结果: 16项临床数据的比较中,病理高危组基础血清肌酐/参考值上限的比值高于低危组[(129.8±42.2)%比(92.4±30.5)%, P=0.029],病理高危组供肾大体观不良者高于低危组(12/16比0/9, P=0)。供者年龄、身高、体质量、体质指数、尿蛋白、血尿、尿糖、获取前肌酐水平、死亡原因等其他14项临床数据在两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论: 经过临床评估和选择性Lifeport评估后,供者基础肌酐水平增高、获取时供肾大体观不良以及Lifeport评估结论不确切的供肾应该进一步做病理评估,这将有助于找出病理高危供肾,进行合理分配以及选择合适的手术方式。.

Keywords: Donor; Kidney transplantation; Time zero biopsy; Transplantation pathology.

MeSH terms

  • Creatinine
  • Graft Survival
  • Humans
  • Kidney
  • Kidney Transplantation*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tissue Donors

Substances

  • Creatinine