Antibacterial Effect of Surface Pretreatment Techniques against Streptococcus Mutans

Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;21(2):170-175. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_98_16.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial surface pretreatment methods against Streptococcus mutans within the infected dentin surface using a tooth cavity model.

Material and methods: Seventy-two cavities were prepared on caries-free third molars (n = 8). After sterilization, teeth were inoculated with S. mutans for 48 h. One cavity of each tooth was used to evaluate the infection. Following inoculation, infected cavity surfaces were treated either with (1) Er:YAG Laser (1W; 5x5s, Smart 2940D Plus, Deka Laser), (2) Ozone (80s; HealOzone, Kavo), (3) ErYAG-Ozone combination, (4) Er:YAG-Ozone-CHX combination, (5) Chlorhexidine (CHX), (6) Clearfil Protect Bond (PB), (7) potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) Laser (1W; 60 s, SMARTLITE D, Deka Laser), (8) KTP-Ozone combination, and (9) KTP-Ozone-CHX. Standardized amounts of dentin chips were obtained from the cavity walls, and the number of bacteria recovered was counted. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analyzes.

Results: Both sole antibacterial materials, CHX or Protect Bond application, exhibited the most effective antibacterial activity with 125 and 156 CFU is an acronym of "colony forming unit" usullay mentioned by acronym. (CFU/ml), respectively, among the groups evaluated (P < 0.05). Er:YAG laser irradiation and its combinations with other antibacterial surface pretreatment applications also inhibited the bacterial growth with, respectively, 1444, 406, and 294 CFU/ml bacterial recovery being more efficient than KTP laser irradiation and ozone combinations.

Conclusions: As an alternative device with photodynamic effects, Er:YAG and KTP laser irradiations and their further combinations during the cavity pretreatment procedure with chlorhexidine and ozone treatments exerted antibacterial effect against S. mutans, whereas chlorhexidine and antibacterial dentin bonding application solely have the highest antibacterial effects.

Keywords: Antibacterial effect; cavity preparation; cavity surface pretreatment techniques; dental; dental infection control; laser antibacterial.

MeSH terms

  • Adhesives / chemistry*
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology*
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / therapeutic use*
  • Chlorhexidine / pharmacology
  • Chlorhexidine / therapeutic use
  • Dental Caries
  • Dental Pulp Cavity / drug effects
  • Dentin / drug effects
  • Dentin / microbiology*
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents / chemistry
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents / pharmacology*
  • Humans
  • Infection Control, Dental / methods*
  • Laser Therapy
  • Lasers, Solid-State
  • Ozone / pharmacology*
  • Streptococcus mutans / drug effects*
  • Streptococcus mutans / growth & development
  • Streptococcus mutans / isolation & purification
  • Tooth

Substances

  • Adhesives
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents
  • Ozone
  • Chlorhexidine