Background: An optimal maximum time of 60minutes has been recommended in recent guidelines for the first evaluation and treatment of patients with acute heart failure (AHF); however, this has not been tested prospectively.
Aim: To analyze the impact of a time-to-treatment (TTT) strategy of <60minutes on the in-hospital outcome of patients with AHF.
Methods: During a single 1-month period, we consecutively enrolled all patients hospitalized with AHF in a prospective cohort. In this pilot study, TTT was defined as the time between the first medical contact to the onset of the first medical intervention. The primary outcome was a composite including in-hospital death or worsening AHF.
Results: Of the 74 patients included, 23 (31%) had a TTT of <60minutes. Although these patients were more likely to have a more severe episode of AHF, the primary outcome occurred only in patients with a TTT of ≥60minutes. The primary outcome was significantly associated with a TTT of ≥60minutes (P=0.036), low systolic blood pressure (P<0.01), rales more than halfway up the lung fields (P=0.02), infectious precipitating factor (P=0.04) and high serum concentrations of B-type natriuretic peptide (P<0.01) and urea (P=0.03). No significant differences were observed in the rate of treatment-induced acute renal insufficiency or in the long-term rates of death or rehospitalization for heart failure according to TTT.
Conclusions: This study suggests that the recently recommended TTT strategy of <60minutes in the setting of AHF might be associated with a better prognosis during hospitalization. Further large prospective works are needed to confirm these preliminary results, and to define more precisely which types of AHF could benefit from this strategy.
Keywords: Acute heart failure; Insuffisance cardiaque aiguë; Outcome; Prognosis; Pronostic; Survie; Therapy; Traitement.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.