'Not all that burns is wood'. A social perspective on fuel exploitation and use during the Indus urban period (2600-1900 BC)

PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0192364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192364. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Ancient civilisations depended heavily on natural fuel resources for a wide array of activities, and this had an impact on such resources that can be traced in the archaeological record. At its urban apex, the populations of the Indus Civilisation (2600-1900 BC) produced a wide range of objects and crafts, several of which involved highly specialised pyrotechnology. In the wake of increasing aridity and a period of weakened monsoon rainfall that affected South Asia from 2100 BC, these activities potentially put pressure on the natural resource base that may have had to be counterbalanced by differentiation in fuel use. The combined analysis of archaeobotanical and geoarchaeological remains from four Indus urban phase archaeological sites, has enable an assessment of the mechanisms through which people exploited wood, and diversified their fuel resources to adapt to the arid to semi-arid environments in which they lived. The combined use of local wood species with alternative fuels, such as dung and crop-processing leftovers, are evidence for resilient socio-ecological practices during the 700 years of Indus urbanism and perhaps beyond.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Archaeology / methods
  • Asia
  • Charcoal / analysis
  • Civilization*
  • Fossil Fuels / statistics & numerical data*
  • Geography
  • Humans
  • Rain
  • Rivers
  • Seasons
  • Soot / analysis
  • Time Factors
  • Urbanization*
  • Wood*

Substances

  • Fossil Fuels
  • Soot
  • Charcoal

Grants and funding

The results presented in this paper are part of the author’s PhD degree obtained at the University of Cambridge, Department of Archaeology in 2010. The research was funded by AHRC Doctoral grant (2007/131224), St John’s College [no grant number], Cambridge European Trust (300469695) and The University of Cambridge (Isbel-Fletcher Garden Fund [no grant number], Smuts Memorial Fund [S2007/E2007], and Anthony Wilkin Fund [no grant number]). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.