Kampala manifesto: Building community-based One Health approaches to disease surveillance and response-The Ebola Legacy-Lessons from a peer-led capacity-building initiative

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Apr 2;12(4):e0006292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006292. eCollection 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Overview: International activities to respond to the Ebola crisis in West Africa were mainly developed and focussed around the biomedical paradigm of Western health systems. This approach was often insensitive to societal perception, attitude, and behavioural determinants and clashed with community-based health traditions, narratives, and roles, e.g., of community health workers. In this peer-led capacity-building initiative, these deficiencies were identified and analysed. Innovative, more locally focussed, community-based solutions were articulated. The new approaches described put local people at the centre of all preparedness, response, and recovery strategies. This paradigm shift reframed the role of communities from victims to active managers of their response and reacknowledged the strength of community-based One Health. We conclude that strategies should aim at empowering, not just engaging, communities. Communities can improve short-term crisis management and build longer-term resilience and capacities that are much needed in the current global health climate.

Background: The Ebola outbreak in West Africa, 2014-2016, was unprecedented in scale, extent, and duration. The international community was slow to step up its assistance in this global public health emergency and then faltered when its infection control management approaches clashed with West African realities [1]. Outbreak response evaluations have identified the need to better integrate social science intelligence [2], better collaborate with communities [3,4], more effectively draw on the strength of community health workers [5], and critically question the paradigm of Western health systems, which focus on imposing 'evidence-based' solutions that lack external validity in affected communities; i.e., they too often recommend actions that are inconsistent with, ignore, or violate traditional behaviours [6]. While there appears to be a consensus now on what needs to be done, how to achieve these goals remains a challenge.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Capacity Building / organization & administration*
  • Community Participation / methods*
  • Disease Outbreaks / prevention & control
  • Education
  • Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola / epidemiology*
  • Humans
  • One Health*
  • Public Health Surveillance / methods

Grants and funding

The Rockefeller Foundation provided a grant to CORDS to develop and hold this Ebola: Intensified Preparedness Programme (IPP), Grant Number 2014 SPN 301. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.