Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study

BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 2;11(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3367-9.

Abstract

Objective: The present study applied the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement to observational studies published in prestigious occupational medicine and health journals.

Results: A total of 60 articles was evaluated. All sub-items were reported in 63.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.24-71.24%), not reported in 29.70% (95% CI, 20.2-39.2%), and not applicable in 6.56% (95% CI, 4.86-8.26%) of the studies. Of the 45 sub-items investigated in this survey, eight were reported 100% of the time, 13 were addressed in more than 90% of the articles, 22 were included in more than 75% of the studies, and 27 sub-items were applied in more than 50% of the articles published in the journals included in this study.

Keywords: Authors; Editors; Journals; Observational studies; Occupational medicine and health; Reviewers; STROBE statement.

MeSH terms

  • Bibliometrics*
  • Biomedical Research / standards*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Epidemiology / standards*
  • Humans
  • Observational Studies as Topic / standards*
  • Occupational Health / standards*
  • Occupational Medicine / standards*
  • Periodicals as Topic / standards*
  • Reproducibility of Results