The reverse remodeling response to sacubitril/valsartan therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Aug;36(4):e12435. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12435. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

Abstract

Background: Major classes of medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) induce reverse remodeling. The revere remodeling response to sacubitril/valsartan remains unstudied.

Methods: We performed a single-center, prospective assessor-blinded study to determine the reverse remodeling response of sacubitril/valsartan therapy in HFrEF patients with a class I indication (New York heart Association [NYHA]-class II-IV, Left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] < 35%, optimal dose with Renin-Angiotensin-System-Blocker [RAS-blocker]). Doses of sacubitril/valsartan were optimized to individual tolerance. Echocardiographic images were assessed offline by 2 investigators blinded to both the clinical data and timing of echocardiograms.

Results: One-hundred-twenty-five HFrEF patients (66 ± 10 years) were prospectively included. The amount of RAS-blocker before and after switch to sacubitril/valsartan was similar(P = .290), indicating individual optimal dosing of sacubitril/valsartan. Over a median(IQR) follow-up of 118(77-160) days after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan, LVEF improved (29.6 ± 6% vs 34.8 ± 6%; P < .001) and Left ventricular end-systolic (LVESV) and end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) decreased (LVESV; 147 ± 57 mL vs 129 ± 55 mL; P < .001 and LVEDV; 206 ± 71 mL vs197 ± 72 mL; P = .027). Volumetric remodeling was associated with a reduction in the degree of mitral regurgitation (1.59 ± 1.0 vs 1.11 ± 0.8; P < .001; [scale from 0-4]). Metrics of diastolic function improved; including a drop in the E/A-wave ratio (1.75 ± 1.13 vs 1.38 ± 0.88; P = .002) and diastolic filling time (% of cycle length) prolonged (48 ± 9% vs 52 ± 1%; P = .005). The percent of patients with a restrictive mitral filling pattern dropped from 47% to 23% (P = .004). A dose-dependent effect was noted for changes in LVEF (P < .001) and LVESV (P = .031), with higher doses of sacubitril/valsartan leading to more reverse remodeling.

Conclusion: Switching therapy in eligible HFrEF patients from a RAS-blocker to sacubitril/valsartan induces beneficial reverse remodeling of both metrics of systolic as diastolic function.

Keywords: echocardiography; heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction; reverse remodeling; sacubitril/valsartan.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aminobutyrates / adverse effects
  • Aminobutyrates / therapeutic use*
  • Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers / adverse effects
  • Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers / therapeutic use*
  • Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers / adverse effects
  • Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers / therapeutic use*
  • Belgium
  • Biphenyl Compounds
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Combinations
  • Echocardiography, Doppler
  • Female
  • Heart Failure / diagnosis
  • Heart Failure / drug therapy*
  • Heart Failure / physiopathology
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Recovery of Function
  • Stroke Volume / drug effects*
  • Tetrazoles / adverse effects
  • Tetrazoles / therapeutic use*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Valsartan
  • Ventricular Function, Left / drug effects*
  • Ventricular Remodeling / drug effects*

Substances

  • Aminobutyrates
  • Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
  • Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers
  • Biphenyl Compounds
  • Drug Combinations
  • Tetrazoles
  • Valsartan
  • sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination