Objective: To investigate the reliability of the distance between the tip of the greater trochanter and inter-teardrop line (GT-IT) in evaluating the leg length discrepancy (LLD) in patients underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Patients who underwent THA in Xi'an Honghui Hospital from August 2015 to February 2016 were enrolled in this study.The patients were measured for bilateral hips anterior-posterior (AP) radiograph preoperatively and postoperatively.Four distances measured, included: GT-IT, the tip of lesser trochanter and bi-ischial line (LT-BI); LT-IT and the anterior superior iliac spine and the medial malleolus (ASIS-MM). Magnification factor was considered when calculating absolute values.Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to detect the reliability of the measurement data.Single factor analysis and paired t test were performed to compare data among the methods. Results: The ICC values of the four groups were greater than 0.80, which showed excellent agreement in the measurements.Single factor analysis of variance showed there were no statistically significant differences in the LLDs of the four groups preoperatively and postoperatively (F=0.914, 0.886, both P>0.05). There was no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative LLD between group GT-IT and group ASIS-MM, LT-BI or LT-IT(t=-1.544-1.114, all P>0.05). The LLDs were comparable between group LT-BI, ASIS-MM and LT-IT both preoperatively and postoperatively (t=1.577, 0.976, 1.344, -0.087, all P>0.05). And the LLD in group LT-IT and ASIS-MM were equivalent preoperatively and postoperatively (t=0.130, 1.063, both P>0.05). Bland-Altman plot illustrated high level of agreements between the four methods. Conclusion: Great reliability can be obtained with the GT-IT in evaluating the LLD in patients undergoing THA.
目的: 探讨使用大转子顶点至泪滴间线距离(GT-IT)测量全髋关节置换患者双下肢长度差异的可靠性。 方法: 选择2015年8月至2016年2月西安市红会医院105例接受人工全髋关节置换的患者术前及术后的双侧髋关节X线正位片,分别测量术前及术后患者双侧髂前上棘至内踝顶点距离(ASIS-MM)、双侧髋关节正位片上GT-IT、小转子顶点至坐骨结节连线的距离(LT-BI)、小转子顶点至泪滴间线的距离(LT-IT),测量数据时考虑X线的放大率。使用同类相关系数检测测量数据的可靠性,使用单因素方差分析及配对t检验方法计算4种方法的差异性,使用Bland-Altman图做一致性检测。 结果: 各组测量数值同类相关系数值均>0.80,观察者间及观察者内一致性优。单因素方差分析显示,4组术前术后对LLD检测结果差异均无统计学意义(F=0.914、0.886,均P>0.05)。GT-IT组术前LLD测量结果与ASIS-MM组、LT-BI组、LT-IT组比较差异均无统计学意义(t=1.114、-0.690、0.683,均P>0.05),GT-IT组术后LLD测量结果与其他3组差异亦无统计学意义(t=0.044、-1.544、-0.925,均P>0.05)。而LT-BI组手术前后LLD测量结果与ASIS-MM、LT-IT组比较差异均无统计学意义(t=1.577、0.976、1.344、-0.087,均P>0.05);LT-IT组手术前后LLD测量结果与ASIS-MM组比较差异均无统计学意义(t=0.130、1.063,均P>0.05)。Bland-Altman图示4种方法一致性良好。 结论: 使用测量GT-IT方法评估全髋关节置换患者双下肢长度差异具有较高的可靠性。.
Keywords: Arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Inter-teardrop line; Leg length discrepancy; Tip of the greater trochanter.