Background: Throughout surgery, specialization in a procedure has been shown to improve outcomes. Currently, there is no evidence for or against subspecialization in coronary surgery. Tasked with the goal of improving outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), our institution sought to determine whether the development of a subspecialized coronary surgery program would improve morbidity and mortality.
Methods: All isolated CABG operations at a single institution were retrospectively examined in two distinct periods, 2002 to 2013 and 2013 to 2016, before and after the implementation of a subspecialized coronary surgery program. Improved policies included leadership and subspecialization of a program director, standardization of surgical technique and postoperative care, and monthly multidisciplinary quality review. Outcomes were collected and compared.
Results: Between 2002 and 2013, 3,256 CABG operations were done by 16 surgeons, the most frequent surgeon doing 33%. Between 2013 and 2016, 1,283 operations were done by 10 surgeons, 70% by the coronary program director. CABGs done in the specialized era had shorter bypass and clamps times and increased use of bilateral internal mammary arteries. Blood transfusion and complication rates, including permanent stroke and prolonged ventilation, were significantly decreased after implementation of the coronary program. Likewise, overall operative mortality (2.67% vs 1.48%, p = 0.02) was significantly reduced.
Conclusions: Subspecialization in CABG and dedicated coronary surgery programs may lead to faster operations, increased use of bilateral internal mammary arteries, fewer complications, and improved survival after isolated CABG.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.