Aim: Even though the Bentall de Bono procedure is widely used for the treatment of aortic root aneurysms, the procedure is under scrutiny nowadays because of complications due to mechanical prosthetic valves and the need for life-long anticoagulation. Due to these complications, aortic valve-sparing operations are being researched. In this study we compared the short-term morbidity and mortality rates of both Bentall de Bono and valve-sparing David V procedures.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data from 70 patients who had undergone surgery for aortic root aneurysm between April 2009 and June 2013. We had performed the Bentall de Bono procedure on 46 patients and the David V procedure on 24 patients. Mortality rates, cardpulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp durations, postoperative arrhythmias, and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were compared in this study.
Results: There was no statistical difference for mortality rate (p = 0.57), while the CPB time and cross-clamp duration were shorter in the Bentall group. When we compared the length of ICU and hospital stay, we observed that the David group stayed longer in ICU (p = 0.003) but the duration of hospital stay was shorter (p = 0.007).
Conclusion: Despite Bentall de Bono being the most commonly used procedure, the short-, mid- and long-term results of both procedures were similar. Spared native aortic valve and lack of anticoagulation usage are notable advantages of the David V procedure.