Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: from data collection to assessment of the grouping hypothesis by application of chemoinformatic techniques

Part Fibre Toxicol. 2018 Sep 24;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12989-018-0273-1.

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of manufactured nanomaterials (NMs) are being used in industrial products and need to be registered under the REACH legislation. The hazard characterisation of all these forms is not only technically challenging but resource and time demanding. The use of non-testing strategies like read-across is deemed essential to assure the assessment of all NMs in due time and at lower cost. The fact that read-across is based on the structural similarity of substances represents an additional difficulty for NMs as in general their structure is not unequivocally defined. In such a scenario, the identification of physicochemical properties affecting the hazard potential of NMs is crucial to define a grouping hypothesis and predict the toxicological hazards of similar NMs. In order to promote the read-across of NMs, ECHA has recently published "Recommendations for nanomaterials applicable to the guidance on QSARs and Grouping", but no practical examples were provided in the document. Due to the lack of publicly available data and the inherent difficulties of reading-across NMs, only a few examples of read-across of NMs can be found in the literature. This manuscript presents the first case study of the practical process of grouping and read-across of NMs following the workflow proposed by ECHA.

Methods: The workflow proposed by ECHA was used and slightly modified to present the read-across case study. The Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF) was used to evaluate the uncertainties of a read-across within NMs. Chemoinformatic techniques were used to support the grouping hypothesis and identify key physicochemical properties.

Results: A dataset of 6 nanoforms of TiO2 with more than 100 physicochemical properties each was collected. In vitro comet assay result was selected as the endpoint to read-across due to data availability. A correlation between the presence of coating or large amounts of impurities and negative comet assay results was observed.

Conclusion: The workflow proposed by ECHA to read-across NMs was applied successfully. Chemoinformatic techniques were shown to provide key evidence for the assessment of the grouping hypothesis and the definition of similar NMs. The RAAF was found to be applicable to NMs.

Keywords: Chemoinformatics; Comet assay; Grouping; Hazard; Nano-TiO2; Nanomaterials; RAAF; REACH; Read-across.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chemical Safety / methods*
  • Databases, Factual
  • Endpoint Determination*
  • Hazardous Substances / chemistry
  • Hazardous Substances / classification*
  • Hazardous Substances / toxicity
  • Nanostructures / chemistry
  • Nanostructures / classification*
  • Nanostructures / toxicity
  • Principal Component Analysis
  • Risk Assessment
  • Titanium / chemistry
  • Titanium / classification*
  • Titanium / toxicity
  • Toxicity Tests

Substances

  • Hazardous Substances
  • titanium dioxide
  • Titanium