Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o
2peak
is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o
2max
J Appl Physiol (1985)
.
2018 Sep 1;125(3):966-967.
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018.
Authors
Li Zuo
1
,
Tingyang Zhou
1
,
Davide Malatesta
2
,
Stefano Lanzi
3
4
,
Grégoire P. Millet
2
,
S Pogliaghi
5
,
D H Paterson
6
,
J M Murias
7
,
Stephan van der Zwaard
8
,
Richard T. Jaspers
8
,
Willem J. van der Laarse
9
Affiliations
1
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
2
Institute of Sport Sciences (ISSUL), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
3
Division of Angiology, Heart and Vessel Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
4
Service of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
5
Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
6
School of Kinesiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
7
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
8
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
9
VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
PMID:
30260762
DOI:
10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018
No abstract available
Publication types
Comment
MeSH terms
Cardiorespiratory Fitness*
Oxygen Consumption
Physical Fitness