Gambling disorder and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: A case report

J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):834-837. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.85. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

Abstract

Introduction: Gambling disorder (GD) is a major public health concern with currently no validated and efficacious treatments approved. In this single case study, we report the short- and long-term effect of bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on craving and impulse control in a subject with GD.

Methods: The patient is a 26-year-old Caucasian male with an 8-year history of GD as well as alcohol and cocaine misuse. Treatment consisted of twice-a-day stimulation for 10 days. According to the literature, both the left (to control craving) and the right (to control emotional impulses) DLPFC were stimulated. Patients subsequently received tDCS once a week for 3 months and then once every 2 weeks for another 3 months.

Results: After 10 days of treatment, the subject reported improved psychiatric symptoms (depression, anxiety, and impulsivity), as well as reduced gambling craving symptom severity. After 3 and 6 months of treatment, the clinical picture further improved.

Discussion: This is the first report of tDCS effectiveness in a single case study of GD. Therapeutic effects, both on the addictive behavior and on psychiatric comorbid symptomatology, were lasting and continued over 6 months of tDCS maintenance treatment. Future case-control studies are required to test the efficacy of this tool in patients with GD.

Keywords: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; gambling disorder; transcranical direct current stimulation.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Craving
  • Gambling / psychology
  • Gambling / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Impulsive Behavior
  • Male
  • Prefrontal Cortex
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation* / methods

Grants and funding

Funding sources: This manuscript was entirely funded by the authors, and no pharmaceutical companies were informed of or involved in the review.