Self-care interventions for adults with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

J Adv Nurs. 2019 Mar;75(3):676-682. doi: 10.1111/jan.13903. Epub 2018 Dec 21.

Abstract

Aim: To synthesize and compare outcomes from controlled trials of interventions to improve heart failure self-care among adults.

Background: Heart failure self-care interventions are recommended for preventing and detecting exacerbations, improving symptom management and preventing hospitalizations. Little is known about the overall effectiveness of heart failure self-care programmes and which types of interventions show the greatest improvement in outcomes.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis, including moderator analyses.

Methods: Multiple databases (including MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) will be searched from inception through 2018 along with grey literature searches to identify trials testing interventions to improve self-care outcomes of adults with heart failure. Data will be extracted from eligible studies on sample, methodological and intervention characteristics and data to calculate effect sizes. Data will be analysed using random-effects models. Moderator variables will be analysed with meta-regression and sub-group analyses. Risk for bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk for Bias tool and by examining potential sources of bias as moderator variables. Funding for this project began in July 2017.

Discussion: We will analyse self-care behaviour outcomes and clinical outcomes including hospitalizations, mortality, disease severity and quality of life. This will be the most extensive meta-analysis of heart failure self-care interventions to date.

Impact: Comparative effectiveness of existing self-care interventions is not yet known. This research will identify the most promising self-care intervention components for designing better interventions and guide targeting of interventions to specific sub-populations. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42017075831.

目的: 对改善成人心力衰竭自我护理效果的干预措施对照试验结果进行综合和对比。

背景: 心力衰竭的自我护理干预措施被推荐用于预防和检测病情加重的情况,促进症状管理和避免住院治疗。

人们对于心力衰竭自我护理计划的整体有效性,以及哪些类型干预措施的成效最为显著,知之甚少。

设计: 系统评价和荟萃分析,包括调节分析。

方法: 搜索从开始到2018年的多个数据库(包括MEDUNE/PubMed、cinahl、PsyclNFO、Scopus和Cochrane对照试验中心注册数据库),并进行灰色文献检索,以确定对改善成人心力衰竭自我护理效果的干预措施进行检测的试验。

从关于样本、方法和干预特征与数据的合格研究中提取数据,进行效应量计算。使用随机效应模型对数据进行分析。使用荟萃回归和子群分析方式对调节变量进行分析。需要使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具,并通过对作为调节变量的潜在偏倚来源进行检查来评估偏倚风险。2017年7月开始为该项目提供资金。

讨论: 我们希望对自我护理行为的效果和临床结果进行分析,包括住院、死亡率、疾病严重程度和生活质量。这将是迄今为止针对心力衰竭自我护理干预措施进行的范围最广泛的荟萃分析。

影响:

  1. 现有自我护理干预措施的相对有效性目前尚不清楚。

  2. 希望通过该项研究确定最有前景的自我护理干预组件,从而设计出更好的干预措施,并为针对特定子人群的干预措施提供指导。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42017075831

Keywords: comparative effectiveness; heart failure; intervention; meta-analysis; nursing; protocol; self-care; systematic review.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Heart Failure* / nursing
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life*
  • Self Care* / methods
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic
  • Treatment Outcome