Achieving high value in the surgical approach to hysterectomy

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):242-245. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.124. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

Abstract

Value-based care, best clinical outcome relative to cost, is a priority in correcting the high costs for average clinical outcomes of health care delivery in the United States. Hysterectomy represents the most common and identifiable nonobstetric major surgical procedure among women. Surgical approaches to hysterectomy in the United States have changed in recent decades. For benign indications, clinical evidence identifies the superiority of vaginal hysterectomy over all other routes. These conclusions rest on clinical outcomes; however, cost differentials also exist across hysterectomy approaches, with the vaginal approach consistently incurring the lowest overall costs. Taken together, vaginal hysterectomy has the highest value, whereas the robotic (given high costs) and abdominal approaches (given less favorable clinical outcomes) have less value. Traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy holds an intermediate value. Increasing the use of high-value hysterectomy approaches can be achieved by adopting multimodal strategies, with changes in the payment models being the most important.

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs*
  • Health Policy
  • Healthcare Disparities / economics
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy / economics
  • Hysterectomy / methods*
  • Hysterectomy / standards
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / economics
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / standards
  • Quality Improvement* / economics
  • United States