Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla

J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Feb;26(1):44-53. doi: 10.1177/1526602818817887. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS-MRA) at 3 tesla in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) vs contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the standard of reference.

Method: Thirty-seven consecutive diabetic patients (mean age 71.8±7.2 years; 30 men) with CLI (Fontaine stage III-IV) underwent QISS-MRA and CE-MRA with calf compression; DSA was the standard. Image quality (5-point Likert-type scale) and stenosis severity (5-point grading) for QISS-MRA and CE-MRA were evaluated by 2 blinded readers in 1147 and 654 vessel segments, respectively. Per-segment and per-region (pelvis, thigh, calf) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated.

Results: Image quality of QISS-MRA was lower compared with CE-MRA in the pelvic region (p<0.001 in both readers) and thigh region (p=0.033 in reader 1 and p=0.018 in reader 2), whereas in the calf region, the image quality of QISS-MRA was better than CE-MRA (p=0.009 in reader 1 and p=0.001 in reader 2). In segment-based analyses, there was no difference between QISS-MRA and CE-MRA in sensitivity [89.5% vs 90.3% in reader 1 (p=0.774) and 87.6% vs 90.6% in reader 2 (p=0.266)] or specificity [94.2% vs 92.9% in reader 1 (p=0.513) and 92.9% vs 92.9% in reader 2 (p>0.999)]. In region-based analyses, QISS-MRA and CE-MRA yielded similar sensitivity and specificity in all areas but the pelvic region for reader 2 (specificity 95.5% vs 84.8%, p=0.041).

Conclusion: QISS-MRA performed very well in diabetic patients with CLI and was a good alternative for patients with contraindications to CE-MRA.

Keywords: aortoiliac arteries; contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography; critical limb ischemia; diabetes; digital subtraction angiography; nonenhanced magnetic resonance angiography; occlusion; quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography; stenosis; superficial femoral artery; tibial artery.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Angiography, Digital Subtraction*
  • Contrast Media / administration & dosage*
  • Critical Illness
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / diagnostic imaging*
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / physiopathology
  • Female
  • Gadolinium DTPA / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Ischemia / diagnostic imaging*
  • Ischemia / physiopathology
  • Lower Extremity / blood supply*
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / diagnostic imaging*
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / physiopathology
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Regional Blood Flow
  • Reproducibility of Results

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Gadolinium DTPA