Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Clinicopathologic factors are not predictive of upgrade after excisional biopsy

Am J Surg. 2019 May;217(5):848-850. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.020. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

Abstract

Introduction: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines currently recommend excisional biopsy for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB) due to the possibility of pathologic upgrade to breast cancer upon excisional biopsy. We aimed to quantify the current rate of upgrade and identify risk factors.

Methods: A retrospective review of women in the Legacy Health Care System with a diagnosis of ADH was performed for 2014 through 2015. Initial pathology and patient factors were reviewed for potential predictors of upgrade.

Results: 91 women with ADH were identified. 84 (92%) underwent excisional biopsy; 16 (19%) were upgraded to breast cancer. Those upgraded were significantly older than non-upgraded patients (64.6 versus 56.7 years, p < 0.01), and 15 (94%) had greater than one duct involved by ADH.

Conclusion: The principal clinicopathologic factor associated with upgrade is increasing patient age, however this is not sufficiently predictive. Excisional biopsy in patients diagnosed with ADH on CNB should continue. Further study may provide an avenue for selective excisional biopsy in patients with ADH.

Keywords: Atypical ductal hyperplasia; Excisional biopsy; Pathologic upgrade.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biopsy, Large-Core Needle*
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Breast Neoplasms / surgery
  • Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / pathology
  • Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating / pathology*
  • Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Registries
  • Retrospective Studies