Longitudinal multi-centre brain imaging studies: guidelines and practical tips for accurate and reproducible imaging endpoints and data sharing

Trials. 2019 Jan 7;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3113-6.

Abstract

Background: Research involving brain imaging is important for understanding common brain diseases. Study endpoints can include features and measures derived from imaging modalities, providing a benchmark against which other phenotypical data can be assessed. In trials, imaging data provide objective evidence of beneficial and adverse outcomes. Multi-centre studies increase generalisability and statistical power. However, there is a lack of practical guidelines for the set-up and conduct of large neuroimaging studies.

Methods: We address this deficit by describing aspects of study design and other essential practical considerations that will help researchers avoid common pitfalls and data loss.

Results: The recommendations are grouped into seven categories: (1) planning, (2) defining the imaging endpoints, developing an imaging manual and managing the workflow, (3) performing a dummy run and testing the analysis methods, (4) acquiring the scans, (5) anonymising and transferring the data, (6) monitoring quality, and (7) using structured data and sharing data.

Conclusions: Implementing these steps will lead to valuable and usable data and help to avoid imaging data wastage.

Keywords: Big data; Data sharing; Guidelines; Longitudinal; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multi-centre; Study design.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Brain / diagnostic imaging*
  • Endpoint Determination
  • Humans
  • Information Dissemination*
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic*
  • Quality Control
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Research Design