Senhance robotic platform for gynecologic surgery: a review of literature

Updates Surg. 2019 Sep;71(3):419-427. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-00620-1. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

Abstract

The advantages of endoscopic procedures are well demonstrated in various surgical procedures. In this field, the technological improvement has been significant. One of the most relevant was made by the introduction of robotic surgery that, thanks to the instruments articulation and the precision of movement, made possible to perform even the most complex procedures. The terms "Alf-X" OR "Senhance" OR "robot" OR "robotic" were systematically used to search the PubMed and Scopus databases. The principal findings considered in the present review were: the study design, the number of patients included in each study, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion rate to standard laparoscopy (SLPS) or laparotomy (LPT), post-operative complications, post-operative hospital stay, and the possible advantages and disadvantages reported by the authors of the studies. A total of eight studies were considered eligible for the present review. The average operative time for TH reported was 110-140 min. In two case-control studies, the operative time was significantly prolonged (P < 0.05) for robotic procedures when compared with SLPS. The EBL was ≤ 100 ml in all studies. Whereas no statistically significant differences were shown in the two case-control studies in terms of conversion to LPT, all studies were in accordance with the post-operative hospital stay, reporting an average of 2 days for total hysterectomy and 1 day for adnexal surgery.

Keywords: Alf-x; Endoscopy; Hysterectomy; Robotic platform; Robotic surgery; Senhance.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / instrumentation*
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Humans
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / instrumentation*
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods