Context.—: The College of American Pathologists published guideline recommending bone marrow synoptic reporting for hematologic neoplasms.
Objective.—: To evaluate the impact of pathology-driven algorithmic testing (PDAT) with integrated reporting for bone marrow examination on test utilization, ability to render a specific World Health Organization diagnosis, and clinician satisfaction 1 year after implementation.
Design.—: We reviewed the hematopathology reports, integrated synoptic reports, and ancillary test results generated during a 12-month period. The initial diagnosis from the hematopathology report was compared with the final diagnosis on the integrated synoptic reports. Test utilization data were compared with a previous year in which ancillary testing was ordered at clinician discretion. Clinicians were anonymously surveyed to assess their satisfaction with PDAT and integrated reporting.
Results.—: Integrated reporting resulted in a World Health Organization diagnosis for 80 of 85 cases (94%) compared with 54 (64%) for the hematopathology report alone. Unnecessary testing decreased from 45% pre-PDAT (124 of 274 cases) to 0.7% PDAT (2 of 268 cases), and PDAT resulted in fewer omissions of necessary tests. Clinicians preferred PDAT and valued integrated reporting for a variety of reasons, including the ease of finding relevant prognostic information.
Conclusions.—: Pathology-driven algorithmic testing with integrated reporting improves the pathologist's ability to render a specific World Health Organization diagnosis and improves test utilization. Clinicians prefer PDAT to clinician-ordered testing. This is the first study to examine how synoptic reporting can modify hematologic diagnoses.