Purpose: This randomized control study was conducted to compare the efficacy of sodium valproate (SVP) and levetiracetam (LEV) following initial intravenous lorazepam in elderly patients (age: >60years) with generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) and to identify predictors of poor seizure control.
Methods: A total of 118 patients (mean age: 67.5 ± 7.5 years, M:F = 1.6:1), who had presented with GCSE were randomized into the SVP or LEV treatment arms. All patients received initial intravenous lorazepam (0.1 mg/kg) followed by one of the two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), parenteral SVP (20-25 mg/kg) or LEV (20-25 mg/kg). Those who failed to achieve control with the initial AED, were crossed over to receive the other AED. One-hundred patients (SVP = 50; LEV = 50) completed the study.
Results: SE could be controlled with lorazepam and one of the AEDs (SVP or LEV) in 71.18% (84/118). Intention-to-treat analysis showed that the two groups did not differ significantly in terms of seizure control [SVP: 41/60 (68.3%); LEV: 43/58 (74.1%), p = 0.486]. Of 100 patients who completed the study, seizure control was achieved in 38/50(76%) in the SVP and 43/50(86%) in the LEV group (p = 0.202). After crossing over to the second AED, SE could be controlled in an additional in 50% (6/12) in SVP (+LEV) group and in 14.3% (1/7) in LEV (+SVP) group. Overall, after the second AED, seizure control was achieved in 77.1% (91/118). Higher STESS was associated with poor therapeutic response (p = 0.049).
Conclusions: The efficacy of SVP and LEV following initial lorazepam in controlling GCSE in elderly population was comparable, hence the choice of AED could be individualized.
Keywords: Elderly seizures; Generalised convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE); Levetiracetam (LEV); Sodium valproate (SVP); Status epilepticus (SE); Treatment of SE.
Copyright © 2019 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.