Pulsatility of the inferior vena cava (IVC) provides information on volume status in healthy subjects and in many clinical conditions. The ultrasound (US) approach to estimating the caval index (CI) is not standardized, as it is operator dependent and vulnerable to measurement errors because of different factors, including movements of the IVC and non-uniform IVC pulsatility along its longitudinal axis. We propose and test in healthy subjects an innovative automated approach, which tracks the IVC movements registered in a B-mode US video clip and estimates the pulsatility of an entire portion of the vein rather than of a single arbitrary section. Large variations in CI estimates were observed along the longitudinal axis (in the worst case, CI ranged between 15% and 60%), indicating the importance of investigating a whole portion of the vessel.
Keywords: Caval index; Inferior vena cava; Tracking; Ultrasound.
Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.