Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations

Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan:147:e129. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818003370.

Abstract

Investigations into an outbreak of foodborne disease attempt to identify the source of illness as quickly as possible. Population-based reference values for food consumption can assist in investigation by providing comparison data for hypothesis generation and also strengthening the evidence associated with a food product through hypothesis testing. In 2014-2015 a national phone survey was conducted in Canada to collect data on food consumption patterns using a 3- or 7-day recall period. The resulting food consumption values over the two recall periods were compared. The majority of food products did not show a significant difference in the consumption over 3 days and 7 days. However, comparison of reference values from the 3-day recall period to data from an investigation into a Salmonella Infantis outbreak was shown to support the conclusion that chicken was the source of the outbreak whereas the reference values from a 7-day recall did not support this finding. Reference values from multiple recall periods can assist in the hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing phase of foodborne outbreak investigations.

Keywords: Foodborne infections; outbreaks.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Animals
  • Canada / epidemiology
  • Chickens
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Contact Tracing / methods*
  • Disease Outbreaks*
  • Food Microbiology
  • Food*
  • Foodborne Diseases / epidemiology*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Meat / microbiology
  • Mental Recall*
  • Middle Aged
  • Population Surveillance
  • Salmonella Infections / epidemiology*
  • Time Factors
  • Young Adult