Cytotoxic synergy between alisertib and carboplatin versus alisertib and irinotecan are inversely dependent on MGMT levels in glioblastoma cells

J Neurooncol. 2019 Jun;143(2):231-240. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03164-5. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

Abstract

Introduction: Glioblastoma remains difficult to treat and patients whose tumors express high levels of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) usually respond poorly to standard temozolomide chemotherapy. We have previously shown that the selective AURKA inhibitor alisertib potently inhibits growth of glioblastoma cells.

Methods: We used colony formation assays, annexin V binding, and western blotting to examine the effects of alisertib on the antiproliferative capabilities of carboplatin and irinotecan in glioblastoma cells.

Results: In colony formation assays, alisertib potentiated the antiproliferative effects of both carboplatin and irinotecan, often synergistically, including against glioblastoma tumor stem-like cells, as demonstrated by Chou-Talalay and Bliss statistical analyses. Western blotting showed that high MGMT expression in cell lines correlated with more pronounced potentiation of carboplatin's growth inhibitory effects by alisertib, while low MGMT expression correlated with stronger potentiation of irinotecan by alisertib. This pattern was also observed when these drug combinations were tested for their ability to induce apoptosis via annexin V binding assays. MGMT knockdown increased apoptosis caused by combined alisertib and irinotecan, while exogenous MGMT overexpression increased apoptosis from alisertib and carboplatin combination treatment.

Conclusions: These results suggest that tumor MGMT expression levels may be predictive of patient response to these drug combinations, and importantly that the combination of alisertib and carboplatin may be selectively effective in glioblastoma patients with high tumor MGMT who are resistant to standard therapy. Since clinical experience with alisertib, carboplatin and irinotecan as single agents already exists, these findings may provide rationale for the design of clinical trials for their use in combination treatment regimens.

Keywords: AURKA; Alisertib; Carboplatin; Cytotoxicity; Glioblastoma; Growth inhibition; Irinotecan; Sequence dependence; Synergy.

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / pharmacology*
  • Apoptosis / drug effects*
  • Azepines / administration & dosage
  • Carboplatin / administration & dosage
  • DNA Modification Methylases / antagonists & inhibitors
  • DNA Modification Methylases / genetics
  • DNA Modification Methylases / metabolism*
  • DNA Repair Enzymes / antagonists & inhibitors
  • DNA Repair Enzymes / genetics
  • DNA Repair Enzymes / metabolism*
  • Drug Synergism*
  • Glioblastoma / drug therapy*
  • Glioblastoma / metabolism
  • Glioblastoma / pathology*
  • Humans
  • Irinotecan / administration & dosage
  • Pyrimidines / administration & dosage
  • RNA, Small Interfering / genetics
  • Tumor Cells, Cultured
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins / genetics
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins / metabolism*

Substances

  • Azepines
  • MLN 8237
  • Pyrimidines
  • RNA, Small Interfering
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins
  • Irinotecan
  • Carboplatin
  • DNA Modification Methylases
  • MGMT protein, human
  • DNA Repair Enzymes