Patient Experience of Systematic Versus Fusion Prostate Biopsies

Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Aug;1(3):202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 May 15.

Abstract

Background: The magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy (FBx) technique has gained popularity in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics, but little is known about its effect on patient experience.

Objective: To evaluate pain, discomfort and other non-infectious complications in PCa patients undergoing either systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (SBx) or FBx and patient willingness to undergo rebiopsy.

Design, setting, and participants: A prospective trial of 262 male patients, 203 of whom underwent transrectal SBx and 59 FBx at Helsinki University Hospital in 2015-2016. Patients completed two questionnaires immediately after and at 30 d after biopsy.

Outcome measurements and statistical analyses: Patients reported pain and discomfort on a numeric rating scale (NRS; 0-10) immediately after biopsy. At 30 d, discomfort was measured on a scale ranging from 1 (no inconvenience) to 4 (maximal inconvenience). Other symptoms were reported dichotomously (yes/no) in both questionnaires. Mann-Whitney U, Pearson's χ2, and logistic regression tests were used.

Results and limitations: For the SBx and FBx groups the median number of cores per patient was 12 and three, respectively. At 30 d, a higher proportion of patients in the SBx group had experienced pain than in the FBx group (70/203 [34%] vs 12/59 [20%]; p=0.043), whereas there was no difference in the median discomfort scores. Hematuria was less common in the FBx group (26/59 [44%] vs 140/203 [69%]; p<0.001). Patients willing to undergo rebiopsy immediately post-biopsy reported lower median NRS (3.0 [interquartile range 2.0-5.0] vs 5.0 [4.3-6.0]; p<0.001) and discomfort scores (4.0 [2.0-6.0] vs 7.0 [5.0-8.0]; p<0.001) than those unwilling. At 30 d, less discomfort (2.0 [interquartile range 1.0-2.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-3.0]; p=0.008) and fever (6/195 [3.1%] vs 6/28 [22%]; p=0.001) were experienced by patients willing to undergo rebiopsy. The nonrandomized design was a limitation.

Conclusions: FBx is associated with less pain and hematuria than SBx during the 30-d interval after biopsy.

Patient summary: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy is associated with less pain, discomfort, and blood in the urine compared to the standard ultrasound-guided procedure. Performing MRI-targeted procedures may reduce biopsy-related complications and promote adherence to recommended repeat biopsy for patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Keywords: Fusion biopsy; Patient experience; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Comorbidity
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration / adverse effects
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration / methods
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration / psychology
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration / statistics & numerical data
  • Hematuria / epidemiology
  • Hematuria / psychology
  • Humans
  • Image-Guided Biopsy / adverse effects
  • Image-Guided Biopsy / methods
  • Image-Guided Biopsy / psychology
  • Image-Guided Biopsy / statistics & numerical data
  • Incidence
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional / adverse effects
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional / psychology
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain, Postoperative / epidemiology
  • Pain, Postoperative / psychology
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Patient Satisfaction / statistics & numerical data*
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Postoperative Complications / psychology
  • Prostate / diagnostic imaging
  • Prostate / pathology*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / psychology