Objective: This study aimed to reveal the efficacy and safety profiles of 4-weekly cabazitaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
Methods: The study included 62 Japanese patients who were treated for CRPC with ≥ 2 courses of cabazitaxel between 2014 and 2017. The oncological outcomes and adverse events were compared between 16 (25.8%) and 46 (74.2%) men who were treated with standard 3-weekly and alternative 4-weekly regimens, respectively.
Results: The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was comparable between the 3-weekly and 4-weekly regimens (median [interquartile range]: - 9.9% [- 64.5 to 13.0%] and - 30.7% [- 52.8 to 10.9%], P = 0.89), respectively. For patients on the 4-weekly regimen, the risks of progression (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 0.71-2.43, P = 0.44), treatment failure (HR, 95% CI 0.84, 0.48-1.55, P = 0.57) and any-cause mortality (HR, 95% CI 1.09, 0.58-2.17, P = 0.79) were comparable to those for patients on the 3-weekly regimen. The incidences of severe adverse events were also similar between the 3-weekly and 4-weekly regimens.
Conclusions: 3-weekly and 4-weekly regimens of cabazitaxel showed similar efficacy and safety profiles in a real-world clinical setting. These data suggest that a 4-weekly regimen may be acceptable for selected patients.
Keywords: Adverse event; Cabazitaxel; Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Docetaxel; Prognostic factor.