Objectives: To analyze the diagnostic value of adding SWE to MRI for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer with false-negative MRI results.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 367 patients who underwent MRI, SWE, and prostate biopsy between March 2016 and November 2018 at the Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free PSA (fPSA) were measured preoperatively. Diagnostic value and accuracy was determined for MRI alone and MRI + SWE using the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.
Results: MRI misdiagnosed 17.9% (21/117) clinically significant prostate cancers, including 15 lesions in the peripheral zone and 6 in the central zone. Both qualitative and quantitative SWE could help detect 66.7% (10/15) significant prostate cancers with false-negative MRI, but there was no association with the Gleason score (p > 0.05). When considering the sextant of the peripheral zone, a significant association was not seen with histopathology in qualitative SWE (p = 0.071) and quantitative SWE (p = 0.598). Among age, PSA, fPSA, volume of the prostate gland, fPSA/PSA, and PSAD, only PSAD (p = 0.019) was associated with SWE results in patients with negative MRI.
Conclusions: Adding SWE to MRI in patients with negative MRI for prostate examination could allow the correct diagnosis of additional patients and reduce the false-negative rate.
Key points: • MRI plays an important role in clinically significant prostate cancers diagnosis. • SWE plays an important role in clinically significant prostate cancers with negative MRI. • Adding SWE to MRI in patients with negative MRI for prostate examination could allow the correct diagnosis of additional patients and reduce the false-negative rate.
Keywords: Biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer.