Transition from active surveillance to observation in prostate cancer patients older than 75 years. A long follow-up series

Introduction: The world population is ageing, and life expectancy is increasing. This situation will have a great impact on the management of patients with prostate cancer, especially in those of low risk, susceptible to a conservative management under active surveillance (AS). Regarding these patients' profile, it is necessary to answer the following questions: ¿for how long to continue with the AS scheme?, ¿which tests will be required?, ¿is it possible to carry out a transition to observation with oncological safety? The objective of this work is to analyse those patients with prostatic cancer who have been in AS with 75 years of age or more and assess the safety of the observation in an AS series with a long follow-up.

Material and methods: We analysed our prospective cohort of AS patients between the years 1999 and 2018,including those who had been in follow-up with 75 years or more. They were offered treatment with curative intent when there were progression criteria and transition to observation under the urologist's decision. Some intermediate risk patients were included in the analysis. Comorbidity changes were analysed with the Charlson comorbidity index at entry and exit of AS. The progression and mortality of the patients were studied according to the management they received.

Results: From 347 AS patients, 90 patients fulfilled the afore mentioned criteria and 15 (16.7%) were intermediate risk. The median follow-up was 6.4 years and 73 (81.1%) had low comorbidity (Charlson<2).There were 40 (44.4%) patients who left AS, 17 (18.9%) of them went to observationand the rest, 21 (23.3%), received curative treatment. There was a significant difference in comorbidity, measured by the Charlson index, at entry and exit of AS (P<.05) among patients receiving active treatment and the ones submitted to observation.No case of cancer-specific death or progression was observed in the observation group.

Conclusion: The transition from an active surveillance management to observation of prostate cancer elderly patients, as well as the decision to carry out a treatment with curative intent, seems controversial. In our series, this transition in patients older than 75 years does not increase the oncological risk.