Tungsten filled 3D printed field shaping devices for electron beam radiation therapy

PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0217757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217757. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Purpose: Electron radiotherapy is a labor-intensive treatment option that is complicated by the need for field shaping blocks. These blocks are typically made from casting Cerrobend alloys containing lead and cadmium. This is a highly toxic process with limited precision. This work aims to provide streamlined and more precise electron radiotherapy by 3D using printing techniques.

Methods: The 3D printed electron cutout consists of plastic shells filled with 2 mm diameter tungsten ball bearings. Five clinical Cerrobend defined field were compared to the planned fields by measuring the light field edge when mounted in the electron applicator on a linear accelerator. The dose transmitted through the 3D printed and Cerrobend cutouts was measured using an IC profiler ion chamber array with 6 MeV and 16 MeV beams. Dose profiles from the treatment planning system were also compared to the measured dose profiles. Centering and full width half maximum (FWHM) metrics were taken directly from the profiler software.

Results: The transmission of a 16MeV beam through a 12 mm thick layer of tungsten ball bearings agreed within 1% of a 15 mm thick Cerrobend block (measured with an ion chamber array). The radiation fields shaped by ball bearing filled 3D printed cutout were centered within 0.4 mm of the planned outline, whereas the Cerrobend cutout fields had shift errors of 1-3 mm, and shape errors of 0.5-2 mm. The average shift of Cerrobend cutouts was 2.3 mm compared to the planned fields (n = 5). Beam penumbra of the 3D printed cutouts was found to be equivalent to the 15 mm thick Cerrobend cutout. The beam profiles agreed within 1.2% across the whole 30 cm profile widths.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that with a proper quality assurance procedure, 3D-printed cutouts can provide more accurate electron radiotherapy with reduced toxicity compared to traditional Cerrobend methods.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Electrons
  • Hazardous Substances / adverse effects
  • Hazardous Substances / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Lead / adverse effects
  • Lead / therapeutic use
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Neoplasms / pathology
  • Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Particle Accelerators
  • Printing, Three-Dimensional*
  • Radionuclide Imaging
  • Radiotherapy
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Tungsten / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Hazardous Substances
  • Lead
  • Tungsten

Grants and funding

This work was funded by internal Stanford hospital quality improvement grant 2017.038. There was no additional external funding received for this study.