Continuous Anticoagulation and Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Heparin Bridging and Hot Snare Polypectomy in Patients on Anticoagulants With Subcentimeter Polyps: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):229-237. doi: 10.7326/M19-0026. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

Abstract

Background: Management of anticoagulants for patients undergoing polypectomy is still controversial. Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is reported to cause less bleeding than hot snare polypectomy (HSP).

Objective: To compare outcomes between continuous administration of anticoagulants (CA) with CSP (CA+CSP) and periprocedural heparin bridging (HB) with HSP (HB+HSP) for subcentimeter colorectal polyps.

Design: Multicenter, parallel, noninferiority randomized controlled trial. (University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000019355).

Setting: 30 Japanese institutions.

Patients: Patients receiving anticoagulant therapy (warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants) who had at least 1 nonpedunculated subcentimeter colorectal polyp.

Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo HB+HSP or CA+CSP and followed up 28 days after polypectomy.

Measurements: The primary end point was incidence of polypectomy-related major bleeding (based on the incidence of poorly controlled intraprocedural bleeding or postpolypectomy bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis). The prespecified inferiority margin was -5% (CA+CSP vs. HB+HSP).

Results: A total of 184 patients were enrolled: 90 in the HB+HSP group, 92 in the CA+CSP group, and 2 who declined to participate after enrollment. The incidence of polypectomy-related major bleeding in the HB+HSP and CA+CSP groups was 12.0% (95% CI, 5.0% to 19.1%) and 4.7% (CI, 0.2% to 9.2%), respectively. The intergroup difference for the primary end point was +7.3% (CI, -1.0% to 15.7%), with a 0.4% lower limit of 2-sided 90% CI, demonstrating the noninferiority of CA+CSP. The mean procedure time for each polyp and the hospitalization period were longer in the HB+HSP than in the CA+CSP group.

Limitation: An open-label trial assessing 2 factors (anticoagulation approach and polypectomy procedure type) simultaneously.

Conclusion: Patients having CA+CSP for subcentimeter colorectal polyps who were receiving oral anticoagulants did not have an increased incidence of polypectomy-related major bleeding, and procedure time and hospitalization were shorter than in those having HB+HSP.

Primary funding source: Japanese Gastroenterological Association.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Video-Audio Media

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anticoagulants / administration & dosage*
  • Colonic Polyps / surgery*
  • Colonoscopy
  • Electrocoagulation / methods*
  • Female
  • Hemostasis, Surgical
  • Heparin / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Japan / epidemiology
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Hemorrhage / epidemiology*
  • Postoperative Hemorrhage / surgery

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Heparin

Associated data

  • UMIN-CTR/UMIN000019355