Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy combined with radical prostatectomy and extended PLND for very high risk locally advanced prostate cancer: A retrospective comparative study

Urol Oncol. 2019 Dec;37(12):991-998. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Abstract

Objective: Docetaxel has been shown to be an effective chemotherapy agent when combined with androgen deprivation therapy for hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (CaP). Since very high risk CaP has a high rate of occult metastatic disease and early recurrence, we hypothesize that patients with very high risk locally advanced CaP may benefit from docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT). Thus, we conducted a retrospective study to identify the outcome of these patients treated with NCHT followed by radical prostatectomy (RP).

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 177 consecutive patients who had very high risk locally advanced CaP between March 2014 and July 2017. Patients received 3 different therapies: (i) 60 men in NCHT group, (ii) 73 men in neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) group, and (iii) 44 men received immediate RP without neoadjuvant therapy (No-NT group). Surgical outcomes were analyzed and survival differences were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: The NCHT group had statistically significant higher preoperative Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) (P < 0.002), higher Gleason score (P < 0.002), and more advanced clinical stage (P < 0.001) than other groups. After RP, 81% (42/52) of patients in NCHT group, 73% (51/70) of patients in NHT group, and 48% (21/44) of patients in No-NT group achieved an undetectable PSA (P < 0.001). A total of 14% (6/42) patients achieving a postoperative undetectable PSA experienced biochemical recurrence in the NCHT group, with median biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) time of 19 months; 47% (24/51) experienced biochemical recurrence in the NHT group, with median bPFS time of 13 months; 81% (17/21) experienced biochemical recurrence in the No-NT group, with median bPFS time of 9 months (P < 0.001). The median follow-up time of 3 groups was 12.5 months in the NCHT group, 18.3 months in the NHT group, and 22.8 months in the No-NT group (P = 0.01).

Conclusion: Despite having poorer prognostic factors, the NCHT group had better bPFS time after surgery compared to NHT and No-NT groups. Randomized controlled investigations are needed to validate these results and further follow-up is required for survival endpoints.

Keywords: Biochemical recurrence; Extended pelvic lymph node dissection; Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy; Radical prostatectomy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Androgen Antagonists / therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal / therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Disease Progression
  • Docetaxel / therapeutic use
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kallikreins / blood
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Lymph Node Excision / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy / methods*
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Pelvis / surgery
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Prostate / pathology
  • Prostate / surgery
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen / blood
  • Prostatectomy*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / blood
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / mortality
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Androgen Antagonists
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
  • Docetaxel
  • KLK3 protein, human
  • Kallikreins
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen