Where do Peer Review Groups fit in the international Continuing Professional Development literature?

Australas Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;27(6):651-654. doi: 10.1177/1039856219871880. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe what is reported in the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) literature on small group learning formats in medicine, including the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) CPD Peer Review Groups (PRGs).

Method: A literature review of international peer-reviewed publications in relation to the use of small group learning formats for CPD in medicine.

Results: Small groups are commonly used as a learning format in medical CPD, primarily in general practice, but are little researched. Such groups take differing forms and they are valued by participants for a range of purposes, having effects on professionalism, clinical performance and doctors' wellbeing.

Conclusion: We believe that the contribution of these groups to medical CPD should be further explored. To this end, this review forms the first part of a research project focussing on the RANZCP PRG model used by Australian and New Zealand psychiatrists.

Keywords: Continuing Medical Education (CME); Continuing Professional Development (CPD); Peer Review Groups; peer groups; quality circles; small group learning.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Australia
  • Education, Medical, Continuing* / organization & administration
  • Humans
  • New Zealand
  • Peer Review*
  • Psychiatry* / organization & administration
  • Societies, Medical* / organization & administration