Purpose: Our goal was to determine whether an economic and social empowerment intervention implemented in Zambézia Province, Mozambique reduced girls' vulnerability to HIV. We use this experience to discuss challenges of evaluating real-world interventions.
Methods: Two rounds of data were collected from 885 girls, 13-19 years, for this clustered, non-equivalent (two-stage) cohort trial. We used multi-level exact matching and difference-in-differences estimation to estimate intervention effects on two outcomes: girls' knowledge of gender-based violence and school attendance.
Results: Estimates of two outcomes analysed indicated no statistically significant intervention effects. Preliminary analysis of data from the intervention group revealed this study was unable to obtain accurate measures for five outcomes related to HIV vulnerability.
Conclusions: Although our study did not find evidence of impact on the a priori selected outcomes, we report on our experience implementing this robust methodologic design and describe how the challenges encountered in this program setting affected our ability to attain results. We recommend prospective evaluation designs with random allocation be accommodated early during planning. When not possible, quasi-experimental studies should collect data from large samples. To reduce measurement bias, biological endpoints such sexually transmitted infections should serve as primary outcomes for programs intending to reduce sexual behaviors.
Keywords: Adolescents; Economic strengthening; Gender-based violence; Girls; HIV prevention; Integrated development; Mozambique; Multi-sector; Quasi-experimental; School attendance; Sexual behavior.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.