Objectives: Surgical treatment of temporo-sphenoidal meningoceles involves the reduction of the meningocele, watertight closure and defect coverage with a nasoseptal flap (NSF). It can be performed contralaterally or ipsilaterally: in the latter situation, the pedicle of the flap must be dissected into the pterygopalatine fossa. The objective of this study was to evaluate the benefit of using an ipsilateral NSF in transpterygoid approaches for the management of temporo-sphenoidal meningoceles, compared to a contralateral NSF, based on a radiological study.
Material and methods: Retrospective monocentric study of 21 cases, between 2002 and 2018. Measurement of the NSF lengths, and lengths needed to cover the defect were evaluated on the preoperative scanner. Early and later failure and complication rates were evaluated.
Results: Seventeen cases of temporo-sphenoidal meningoceles with available CT scan were identified. The mean duration of follow up was 27.9 months [1-147]. Theoretical lengths of the ipsi and contralateral NSF were comparable: 71.4±7.8mm vs. 78.8±8mm, P=0.729. In 8 cases/18 (42%), the theoretical length of the contralateral NSF was not long enough to cover the defect beyond the V2 (mean lack of 8.87±6.6mm). In all cases, the theoretical length of the ipsilateral NSF was sufficient to cover the defect. In the case series, failure and complication rates were similar.
Conclusion: The use of an ipsilateral NSF for the transpterygoid management of temporo-sphenoidal meningoceles, although more complex, allows a better coverage of the defect, compared to the contralateral NSF, which is not long enough in 42% of cases.
Keywords: Ipsilateral; Meningocele; Nasoseptal flap; Temporosphenoidal; Transpterygoid.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.