Trends and recommendations for critical care nursing research in the Nordic countries: Triangulation of review and survey data

Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020 Feb:56:102765. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2019.102765. Epub 2019 Nov 1.

Abstract

Background: Priorities for critical care nursing research have evolved with societal trends and values. In the 1980s priorities were the nursing workforce, in 1990s technical nursing, in 2000s evidence-based nursing and in 2010s symptom management and family-centred care.

Objectives: To identify current trends and future recommendations for critical care nursing research in the Nordic countries.

Methods: We triangulated the results of a literature review and a survey. A review of two selected critical care nursing journals (2016-2017) was conducted using content analysis to identify contemporary published research. A self-administered computerised cross-sectional survey of Nordic critical care nursing researchers (2017) reported current and future areas of research.

Results: A review of 156 papers identified research related to the patient (13%), family (12%), nurse (31%), and therapies (44%). Current trends in the survey (n = 76, response rate 65%) included patient and family involvement, nurse performance and education, and evidence-based protocols. The datasets showed similar trends, but aftercare was only present in the survey. Future trends included symptom management, transitions, rehabilitation, and new nursing roles.

Conclusion: Critical care nursing research is trending toward increased collaboration with patient and family, delineating a shift toward user values. Recommendations include long-term outcomes and impact of nursing.

Keywords: Critical care nursing; Intensive care unit; Research priorities; Review; Survey.

MeSH terms

  • Critical Care Nursing / standards*
  • Critical Care Nursing / trends*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Guidelines as Topic*
  • Humans
  • Nursing Research / standards*
  • Nursing Research / trends*
  • Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic*