Net positive outcomes for nature

Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Jan;4(1):4-7. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1022-z.

Joseph W Bull^{1

2}, E J Milner-Gulland³, Prue F E Addison³, William N S Arlidge³, Julia Baker^{3

4}, Thomas M Brooks^{5

6

7}, Michael J Burgass^{3

8

9}, Amy Hinsley³, Martine Maron¹⁰, John G Robinson¹¹, Nik Sekhran¹², Samuel P Sinclair^{3

9}, Simon N Stuart¹³, Sophus O S E Zu Ermgassen¹⁴, James E M Watson^{10

11}

¹ Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. [email protected].
² Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. [email protected].
³ Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
⁴ Balfour Beatty Civil Engineering, London, UK.
⁵ International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.
⁶ World Agroforestry Center, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
⁷ Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
⁸ Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
⁹ Biodiversify Ltd, Newark, UK.
¹⁰ University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
¹¹ Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, NY, USA.
¹² World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC, USA.
¹³ Synchronicity Earth, London, UK.
¹⁴ Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

No abstract available