Clinical outcome after progressing to frontline and second-line Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in advanced urothelial cancer

Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for first-line (cisplatin unfit, PD-L1+) and platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC). Still, most patients experience progressive disease (PD) as the best response. Although higher response rates to subsequent systemic treatment (SST) have been described, post-PD outcome data are scarce.

Objective: To examine the outcome of UC patients who received SST and no SST after progressing to ICIs.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective analysis of UC patients progressing to frontline or later-line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in 10 European institutions was conducted between March 2013 and September 2017.

Intervention: Post-PD management as per standard practice.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Overall survival (OS) was analyzed with a Kaplan-Meier model. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis (MV). Impact of SST on OS was examined with a time-varying covariate model.

Results and limitations: A total of 270 UC patients with PD to ICIs (69 frontline, 201 later line) were analyzed. Of the patients, 57% of frontline-ICI-PD and 34% of later-line-ICI-PD patients received SST, and SST had an impact on OS in MV (frontline: hazard ratio [HR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.51, p < 0.001; later line: HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13-0.36, p < 0.001). In the frontline-ICI-PD group, median OS with and without SST was 6.8 mo (95% CI 5.0-8.6) and 1.9 mo (95% CI 0.9-3.0), respectively. High disease burden (three or more metastatic sites: HR 2.49, p = 0.03; simultaneous liver/bone metastases: HR 3.93, p = 0.03) predicted worse survival. In later-line-ICI-PD group, response to ICIs (HR 0.37, p = 0.03), longer exposure to ICIs (HR 0.89, p = 0.002), and bone metastasis (HR 2.42, p < 0.001) predicted survival. The retrospective nature of this study and a lack of certain parameters limit the interpretation of our analysis.

Conclusions: Patients progressing to frontline ICIs are at risk of early death, excluding them from experiencing potential benefit from chemotherapy PATIENT SUMMARY: Our analysis suggests that outcomes after failing immunotherapy are poor, particularly in UC patients who received no prior chemotherapy.

Keywords: Bladder cancer; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Immunotherapy; PD-1; PD-L1; Urothelial carcinoma.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell / drug therapy*
  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urologic Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Urologic Neoplasms / pathology

Substances

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors