Objective: The number of hip and knee replacement performed is rising, causing increased pressure for the timely management of these patients. A dry incision is considered a prerequisite for discharge. This is a retrospective cohort study comparing two treatments for skin closure during elective hip and knee arthroplasty.
Methods: A barbed monofilament absorbable 3.0 subcuticular suture (Quill), with the additional surface application of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue, was used for the study group and metal clips or a smooth monofilament absorbable 3.0 subcuticular suture (Monocryl) for the control group. Each group comprised 46 hip and 27 knee replacement patients and data on predisposing risk factors for prolonged wound exudate were collected. We have calculated the proportion of patients who have exceeded their expected length of stay due to a wound exudate, the additional days required for the wound to dry and the derived cost.
Results: No significant differences were identified with regards to risk factors. The study group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of exudating wounds of excessive duration (1% versus 14%, p=0.005, relative risk: 10; 95% confidence interval: 1.31-76.13). The combined additional stay was 22 days more for the control group, producing an average financial benefit of £80 per patient for the study group. There were seven knee replacement and two hip replacement patients treated with a nozzled glue applicator who presented with delayed (> 2 weeks) wound healing issues.
Conclusion: Barbed subcuticular suture with surface glue application is a viable option for skin closure after elective lower limb joint arthroplasty and can reduce the incidence of prolonged wound discharge. A brushed glue applicator should be preferred over the nozzled one.
Keywords: barbed suture; hip replacement; knee replacement; skin glue; wound discharge; wound exudate.