Incorporating New Evidence on Inhaled Medications in COPD. The Latin American Chest Association (ALAT) 2019
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2020 Feb;56(2):106-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2019.09.023.
Epub 2019 Nov 22.
[Article in
English,
Spanish]
Authors
María Montes de Oca
1
, Maria Victorina López Varela
2
, Agustín Acuña
3
, Eduardo Schiavi
4
, Alejandro Casas
5
, Antonio Tokumoto
6
, Carlos A Torres Duque
5
, Alejandra Ramírez-Venegas
7
, Gabriel García
8
, Aquiles Camelier
9
, Miguel Bergna
10
, Mark Cohen
11
, Efraín Sanchez-Angarita
3
, Santiago Guzmán
12
, Karen Czischke
13
, Manuel Barros
14
, Alejandra Rey
2
Affiliations
- 1 Hospital Universitario de Caracas, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela. Electronic address: [email protected].
- 2 Universidad de la República, Hospital Maciel, Montevideo, Uruguay.
- 3 Hospital Universitario de Caracas, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela; Departamento de Investigación y Estadística, ITSalud/Medsolid, Caracas, Venezuela.
- 4 SubSecretaría de Planificación Sanitaria, Ministerio de Salud, Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- 5 Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.
- 6 Hospital Central Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Perú.
- 7 Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Ciudad de México, México.
- 8 Hospital Rodolfo Rossi, La Plata, Argentina.
- 9 Universidade do Estado da Bahia e Escola Bahiana de Medicina, Salvador, Brasil.
- 10 Hospital Dr. Antonio Cetrángolo, Vicente López, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- 11 Hospital Centro Médico, Guatemala, Guatemala.
- 12 Hospital José Gregorio Hernández, Caracas, Venezuela.
- 13 Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Hospital Padre Hurtado, Universidad del Desarrollo, San Ramón, Región Metropolitana, Chile.
- 14 Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Hospital C. Van Buren, Valparaíso, Región de Valparaíso, Chile.
Abstract
This document on COPD from the Latin American Chest Association (ALAT-2019) uses PICO methodology to analyze new evidence on inhaled medication and answer clinical questions. The following key points emerged from this analysis: 1) evidence is lacking on the comparison of short-acting vs. long-acting bronchodilators in patients with mild COPD; patients with moderate-to-severe COPD obtain greater benefit from long-acting bronchodilators; 2) the benefits of monotherapy with long-acting antimuscarinic agents (LAMA) and combined therapy with long-acting β2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) are similar, although the latter is associated with a greater risk of pneumonia; 3) LABA/LAMA offer greater benefits in terms of lung function and risk of exacerbation than LABA/ICS (the latter involve an increased risk of pneumonia), 4) LAMA/LABA/ICS have greater therapeutic benefits than LABA/LAMA on the risk of moderate-severe exacerbations. With regard to the role of eosinophils in guiding the use of ICS, ICS withdrawal must be considered when the initial indication was wrong or no response is elicited, in patients with side effects such as pneumonia, and in patients with a low risk of exacerbation and an eosinophil blood count of <300 cells/μl. All this evidence, categorized according to the severity of the obstruction, symptoms, and risk of exacerbations, has been used to generate an algorithm for the use of inhaled medication in COPD.
Keywords:
COPD; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EPOC; Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica; Inhaled medication; Medicación inhalada.
Copyright © 2019 SEPAR. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
Publication types
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
MeSH terms
-
Administration, Inhalation
-
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists* / adverse effects
-
Humans
-
Latin America
-
Muscarinic Antagonists / adverse effects
-
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive* / drug therapy
Substances
-
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
-
Muscarinic Antagonists