Early Cutoff Criteria for Strong Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 May 22;35(4):429-433. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acz079.

Abstract

Objective: The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) is widely used to assess performance validity. To improve efficiency, we investigated whether abbreviated administration (i.e., only the first 25 items of Trial 1 [T1]) is possible when effort is very strong (≥49/50 on T1 or T2).

Method: We collected TOMM scores of 501 consecutive adult patients ranging in cognitive status who underwent standard neuropsychological evaluation at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Results: Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis showed excellent area under the curve (AUC) (0.94; CI95% [0.92, 0.97]) and a cutoff of 25/25 had 100% specificity for identifying strong performance. Of the 224 patients who obtained a perfect score on the first 25 items, 197 (88%) obtained ≥49 on T1 and the remaining patients (n = 27) obtained ≥49 on T2.

Conclusion: A perfect score on the first 25 items of the TOMM predicted overall strong performance 100% of the time, supporting abbreviated administration in select cases in a general outpatient clinical setting.

Keywords: Effort; Test of Memory Malingering; Validity testing.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Humans
  • Malingering* / diagnosis
  • Memory Disorders* / diagnosis
  • Memory and Learning Tests
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results