[Value of myocardial scar in predicting malignant ventricular arrhythmia in patients with chronic myocardial infarction]

Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Jul 25;48(5):511-516. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.10.08.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To assess the predictive value of myocardial scar mass in malignant ventricular arrhythmia (MVA) after myocardial infarction.

Methods: Thirty myocardial infarction patients with complete electrophysiology and cardiac MRI data admitted from January 2012 to August 2017 were enrolled in the study. According to the results of intracavitary electrophysiological study, MVA developed in 16 patients (MVA group) and not developed in 14 patients (non-MVA group). The qualitative and quantitative analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVFE) and scar mass was performed with CVI42 post-processing software and predictive value of myocardial scar and LVEF for MVA after myocardial infarction was analyzed using ROC curves.

Results: LVEF in MVA group was significantly lower than that in non-MVA group, and scar mass in MVA group was significantly higher than that in non-MVA group (all P<0.05). Regression analysis showed that LVEF (OR=1.580) and scar mass (OR=6.270) were risk factors for MVA after myocardial infarction. For predicting MVA, the area under ROC curve (AUC) of LVEF was 0.696 with a sensitivity of 0.786 and the specificity of 0.685; the AUC of the scar mass was 0.839 with a sensitivity was 0.618 and the specificity of 0.929; the AUC of LVEF combined with scar mass was 0.848 with a sensitivity of 0.688 and specificity of 0.857.

Conclusions: Myocardial scar assessed by late gadolinium enhancement MRI is more effective than LVEF in predicting MVA after myocardial infarction.

目的: 分析心脏磁共振延迟强化量化的心肌瘢痕质量对慢性心肌梗死后恶性心律失常(MVA)发生的预测价值。

方法: 选取2012年1月至2017年8月浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院有完整腔内电生理及心脏磁共振资料的心肌梗死患者30例,根据腔内电生理检查结果分为两组:诱发出MVA组(16例)及未诱发出MVA组(14例)。通过CVI 42后处理软件对左心室射血分数(LVEF)及延迟强化评估的心肌瘢痕进行定性及定量分析,ROC曲线分析比较心肌瘢痕与LVEF对心肌梗死后MVA的预测价值。

结果: 诱发出MVA组LVEF明显低于未诱发出MVA组,延迟强化评估的瘢痕质量也更大(均 P < 0.05)。回归分析发现,心肌瘢痕质量及LVEF为心肌梗死后MVA发生的风险因子( OR=6.270和1.580)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,LVEF预测心肌梗死后MVA的 AUC为0.696,敏感度为0.786,特异度为0.685;瘢痕质量预测心肌梗死后恶性室性心律失常的 AUC为0.839,敏感度为0.618,特异度为0.929;LVEF与瘢痕质量两个指标联合预测心肌梗死后MVA的 AUC为0.848,敏感度为0.688,特异度为0.857。

结论: 心肌瘢痕对预测心肌梗死后MVA发生的效能较LVEF更高,有望成为心肌梗死后患者预后评估的另一项预测指标。

MeSH terms

  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac* / diagnosis
  • Cicatrix* / diagnostic imaging
  • Contrast Media
  • Gadolinium
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Infarction* / complications
  • Myocardial Infarction* / diagnostic imaging
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Ventricular Function, Left

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Gadolinium

Grants and funding

国家自然科学基金(81873908);浙江省医药卫生科技计划(2018KY170)