A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications

Invest Radiol. 1988 Oct;23(10):725-8. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198810000-00004.

Abstract

The detectability of malignant tumor-derived microcalcifications with conventional mammography was compared to that with digital images (2000 X 2510 pixels by 10 bits) derived from a storage phosphor-based digital radiography system capable of 5 line pair/mm resolution at identical exposure factors (30 kVp, 250 mAs, 65 cm film-focus distance). Microcalcifications (50-800 microns in diameter) were randomly superimposed on a preserved human breast specimen. ROC analysis based on 480 observations made by four readers indicated that the ability to detect the calcifications with digital images (ROC area = 0.871 +/- 0.066) was equivalent to conventional mammography (ROC area = 0.866 +/- 0.075) despite lower spatial resolution. With digital mammography, 62% of all clusters were correctly localized, but only 23.6% of the individual calcifications were counted. With conventional mammography 61% of all clusters were correctly localized, but significantly more of the individual calcifications (31.5%) were counted.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Breast Diseases / diagnostic imaging*
  • Breast Diseases / etiology
  • Breast Neoplasms / complications*
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Calcinosis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Calcinosis / etiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Mammography*
  • Models, Structural
  • ROC Curve
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement*