Biomechanical cadaver study of proximal fixation in a minimally invasive bipolar construct

Study design: Biomechanical human cadaver study.

Objective: To determine the three-dimensional intervertebral ranges of motion (ROMs) of intact and hook-instrumented thoracic spine specimens subjected to physiological loads, using an in vitro experimental protocol with EOS biplane radiography. Pedicle screws are commonly used in thoracic instrumentation constructs, and their biomechanical properties have been widely studied. Promising clinical results have been reported using a T1-T5 thoracic hook-claw construct for proximal rod anchoring. Instrumentation stability is a crucial factor in minimizing mechanical complications rates but had not been assessed for this construct in a biomechanical study.

Methods: Six fresh-frozen human cadaver C6-T7 thoracic spines were studied. The first thoracic vertebrae were instrumented using two claws of supra-laminar and pedicle hooks, each fixed on two adjacent vertebrae, on either side of a single free vertebra. Quasi-static pure-moment loads up to 5 Nm were applied to each specimen before and after instrumentation, in flexion-extension, right and left bending, and axial rotation. Five steel beads impacted in each vertebra allowed 3D tracking of vertebral movements on EOS biplanar radiographs acquired after each loading step. The relative ranges of motion (ROMs) of each pair of vertebras were computed.

Results: Mean ROMs with the intact specimens were 17° in flexion-extension, 27.9° in lateral bending, and 29.5° in axial rotation. Corresponding values with the instrumented specimens were 0.9°, 2.6°, and 7.3°, respectively. Instrumentation significantly (P < 0.05) decreased flexion-extension (by 92-98%), lateral bending (by 87-96%), and axial rotation (by 68-84%).

Conclusion: This study establishes the biomechanical stability of a double claw-hook construct in the upper thoracic spine, which may well explain the low mechanical complication rate in previous clinical studies.

Level of evidence: Not applicable, experimental cadaver study.