Diagnostic strategy in suspected duodenal ulcer disease. A questionnaire study

Acta Med Scand. 1988;224(6):583-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1988.tb19630.x.

Abstract

In a questionnaire study of 89 Danish gastroenterologists the current diagnostic strategy in patients suspected of having duodenal ulcer disease was elucidated. A case summary concerning a patient with upper abdominal pain was presented. It was assumed that the patient had had a double-contrast barium meal examination or an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed. If the X-ray had revealed a deformity of the duodenal bulb, 30% of the gastroenterologists would offer the patient specific medical treatment (H2-blocking agent etc.), but a significantly higher number of gastroenterologists, 45%, (p less than 0.05) would offer specific medical treatment if a deformity was revealed at endoscopy. There was also a significant difference (p less than 0.01) between those who would offer specific treatment if X-ray (84%) or if endoscopy (100%) had revealed an ulcer. Considerable variation was found among experts in their decisions on the basis of X-ray and endoscopy in patients with suspected duodenal ulcer disease. Gastroenterologists generally rely more on endoscopic than on radiographic findings.

MeSH terms

  • Barium
  • Decision Making
  • Duodenal Ulcer / diagnosis*
  • Duodenal Ulcer / diagnostic imaging
  • Duodenoscopy
  • Duodenum / diagnostic imaging
  • Duodenum / pathology
  • Humans
  • Methods
  • Radiography

Substances

  • Barium